Stumbling comedians have grabbed the crutch of free-speech martyrdom often enough that we should recall one central fact about the late George Carlin: He was an artist and linguistic provocateur, but he never set out to create a new law of speech.
The respondent in the landmark 1978 Supreme Court case over his "Filthy Words" bit was not Carlin but a public radio network that had played the routine during a midafternoon show about censorship. Carlin, having begun his career as a clean-cut observational comic ... , enjoyed a long, lustrous career as the kind of beloved anti-establishmentarian you'd trust to play Thomas the Tank Engine's Mr. Conductor. His funniest routine - a side-by-side comparison of baseball and football - wasn't even dirty. The comedian didn't push the limits of free speech so much as explore the borders of our word choices and the ludicrousness of those who would regulate those choices. ...
The decision in FCC vs. Pacifica was written by Justice John Paul Stevens, who went on to become the high court's leading liberal. As with most efforts to put a moderate face on the suppression of speech, the ruling ended up muddying, rather than clarifying, the legal environment. The Federal Communications Commission never grew comfortable with putting together a list of unspeakable words, nor was it willing to say precisely which hours were OK for broadcasting grown-up language and which were not.
Carlin, whose real target was the nudge-and-wink culture that traffics in euphemism while obsessing about what's appropriate to say, appreciated nuances like that. You can't say the "f-word" on TV, he noted, yet without coy references to sexual congress, bedroom mix-up plots and lewd bantering with honeymooning couples, there wouldn't be much TV at all.
This editorial first appeared in the LA Times on Tuesday.
Although the Hollister Free Lance does not have any obligation to monitor this board, the Hollister Free Lance reserves the right at all times to check this board and to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable to the Hollister Free Lance in our sole discretion and to disclose any information necessary to satisfy the law, regulation, or government request. The Hollister Free Lance also reserves the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions. All threats to systems or site infrastructure shall be assumed genuine in nature and will be reported to the appropriate law enforcement authorities. Submission of any comments will be considered permission to use online or in print.
Highlights from the Prune Bowl now available
